Our Technology

Speckleplethysmography (SPG) and photoplethysmography (PPG) are both optical techniques used to measure physiological parameters like tissue oxygenation, but they differ in their underlying principles and practical advantages. SPG, which leverages laser speckle contrast imaging, offers some distinct benefits over PPG, especially in specific contexts for assessing tissue oxygenation. Here’s a breakdown of those advantages based on how they work and their real-world implications:

SPG uses coherent laser light to detect blood flow dynamics through the speckle patterns created by light scattering off moving red blood cells. This makes it particularly sensitive to microcirculatory changes, which are critical for understanding tissue oxygenation at a deeper and more detailed level. PPG, on the other hand, relies on the absorption of light (typically from LEDs) by hemoglobin to measure blood volume changes, primarily in larger vessels like arteries. While PPG is excellent for tracking arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2), SPG’s focus on microcirculation gives it an edge in capturing tissue-level oxygenation, including in capillaries and smaller vessels where oxygen exchange actually happens.

One key benefit of SPG is its robustness in low-perfusion states. PPG can struggle when blood flow is weak—think hypothermia, shock, or vascular occlusions—because it depends on a strong pulsatile signal from arteries. SPG, by contrast, doesn’t rely solely on pulsatile flow; it can detect subtle movements of red blood cells even in low-flow conditions, making it more reliable for monitoring tissue oxygenation in critically ill patients or during procedures where circulation is compromised.

Another advantage is SPG’s potential for higher spatial resolution. Since it’s often paired with imaging techniques, SPG can map oxygenation across a tissue area, revealing variations that PPG, which typically averages a single point, might miss. This could be a game-changer in scenarios like wound healing or burn assessment, where knowing oxygen distribution in tissue is more valuable than a single arterial snapshot.

SPG also tends to be less affected by motion artifacts in certain setups. PPG signals can get noisy if the sensor shifts or the patient moves, as it’s sensitive to changes in light absorption that aren’t related to blood volume. SPG, focusing on speckle contrast tied to blood cell motion, can sometimes filter out these distractions better, especially with advanced processing or imaging approaches. That said, this depends on the setup—contact-based SPG might still face motion challenges, but non-contact versions show promise here.

Sensitivity to deeper tissue layers is another plus for SPG. The coherent light it uses penetrates further than the LED light in PPG, which is often limited to superficial layers like the dermis. This deeper reach allows SPG to assess oxygenation in tissues beyond what PPG can reliably access, offering a more comprehensive picture of oxygen delivery and uptake.